Showing posts with label BILL HOEST. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BILL HOEST. Show all posts

Thursday, April 25, 2019

cartoon themes: the department store, part 2

John Dempsey
Playboy, January 1956
Cavalcade, circa 1940s
J. B. Handelsman
Playboy, March 1972
????
Gee Whiz, April 1967
Bill Hoest
Gee Whiz, April 1967
Knight, March 1967
Saturday Evening Post October 11, 1952
Escapade, May 1956
Harry Mace
For Laughing Out Loud, March 1960
Pete Wyma
Good Humor, October 1964
Eldon Dedini
Playboy, December 1969
Jack O'Brien
The Dude, July 1957

Thursday, October 26, 2017

cartoons I don't get 19

Playboy, March 1967
The only thing I can think of is this must be some kind of buggery joke. I don't think it's just a dog in stocks, which is kind of funny in and of itself. And I don't think it's that he gave the dog a black eye. The joke must be that he had sex with the dog. Though during that time in cases of bestiality the animal would be punished in addition to the person, so this would be an illustration rather than a cartoon.
Punch October 26, 1915
Look at the date on that cartoon. Isn't that a weird coincidence? Wait a moment, I did that same joke a few weeks ago when I posted a cartoon that was printed on the same date. Never mind.
Scamp, November 1957
Too bad this cartoon was done before the sexual revolution. If it were done in the 70's or afterwards they tied in the phrase “the captain goes down with his ship” with cunnilingus or depending on the time and kind of publication, the captain could be of either gender performing either kind of oral sex.
Playboy, March 1968
Bill Hoest
Is it that they're cartographers? Is it progressive for the time in that the woman is also one or is she just a secretary delivering a map? I would guess, considering it's by a guy most famous for doing a strip about a “battle-axe” wife, it's the latter.
Esquire, June 1934
Syd Hoff
Hello Buddies, June 1952
My impression is that the long-extinct Dime-a-Dance business was always a front for prostitution. Maybe that guy is me.
Hello Buddies, Winter 1950
Bill Wenzel
Who's talking? The first rule of gag cartooning is that only the person who's talking has their mouth open. And why is one of the women topless?
Hi-Life, August 1964
Don Orehek
These next three are the trifecta of taboos. Cartoons that don't age well. Cartoons no magazine would print today.
First up, we have fat-shaming...
Good Humor, circa 1964
...pedophilia...
Jest, circa 1942
...and racism. At least I think this is supposed to be racist. But I don't get the glasses part. Is it just that the guy's an asshole?
Man, April 1966
Nugget, February 1956
It's questionable whether or not this is politically incorrect. It's still okay to make fun of homelessness in some contexts, I think. I think it's French, too. They have different standards about what can or can't be mocked.
Punch October 27,1915
A hole caused by warfare possibly?

Thursday, September 7, 2017

Cartoons I don't get 12

Bill Wenzel
Fun House, February 1980
Punch October 27, 1915
I know, this is just what it says. They must be really dumb if they think the play is using real champagne.
Adam, May 1973
This is It #22
Gregory D'Alessio
Army/Navy Fun Parade, April 1953
Hello Buddies, Summer 1954
I guess the male fantasy of the age difference between the mother and daughter being three years apart existed back in the fifties too.
Punch December 8, 1915
Good Humor, c. 1964
Oh, never mind, it's a joke about breasts. It must have gone over my head because there are so few gag cartoons with double entendres. Especially ones about female anatomy.
Esquire, June 1934
Morrie Turner
Jem, June 1957
Maybe the old man thought the director was referring to him when he was talking about the donkey.
Stray comment: The director looks like he's older than the old man. He also looks like Groucho Marx in his final years.
Bill Hoest
Man, April 1966
Why would his mother not know she has a grandchild yet? And if it's a prostitute and not his fiancee, wouldn't she already have methods of birth control? And if she's already committing one illegal act, wouldn't it follow she would commit another (this was pre-Roe v Wade)?
Pic, November 1952
Are these kids all related? And if so, wouldn't the parents go through this every day?
Hello Buddies, June 1952
“Old fashioned” used ironically because it's caveman days? And as an aside, we can also see from the dinosaur bigger than a mountain that The Flintstones was not the first example of creationist propaganda.

Thursday, June 1, 2017

cartoons I don't get

To be honest, although I post a lot of cartoons here, sometimes I don't get them. Here are a few.

Adam, July 1973
Good Humor, circa 1964
Harvard Lampoon, October 1902
Charles Rodrigues
Adam, July 1967
Sid Harris
Gent, October 1963
Frederick Opper Puck, 1893
Charles Dennis
Army/Navy Fun Parade, April 1953
Joseph Farris
Bold, July 1954
Leo Garel
Fun House, November 1980
Woody Kimbrell
California Girls, January 1973
Bill Hoest
Caper, November 1964
Esquire, January 1934
Man, April 1966