Showing posts with label DAVID PASCAL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DAVID PASCAL. Show all posts

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Another twelve

David Pascal
The Gent, June 1963
Leo Garel
The Gent, October 1963
Dude, January 1961
Charles Dennis
Dude, September 1964
Gentlemen's Yearbook, Spring 1964
High, November 1958
Ed Fisher
Nugget, February 1956
Hi-Life, August 1964
Jaguar, circa 1961
Men< January 1965
Adam 1960 Annual
Adam, January 1957

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Laugh Parade, 6 of 6

This is the sixth part of the gag cartoons from the second issue of Laugh Parade. I've been posting them every Thursday and they can be found through the archives on the right, and the text accompanying those posts tell the possible origin of the magazine and those cartoons.

Jean Bosc did these first two.
David Pascal
This was the back cover. There were no ads.

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Laugh Parade, part 3

This is the third part of the gag cartoons from the second issue of Laugh Parade dated September 1961. Most likely these are printed from other magazines published by “Non-Pareil Publishing”, one of the many names Magazine Management (now Marvel Comics) used as a tax dodge.

This first cartoon was by Vahan Shirvanian
David Pascal
These next few, until further notice, were from a two=page spread entitled The Charming World of Gunther Ganzler
Okay, it's done now.

I don't know who these other people are, though.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Broadway Laughs, part 2

More gag cartoons from the August 1974 issue of Broadway Laughs

Believe it or not, sometimes I feel guilty about posting as many T&A cartoons as I do.

With this batch, though, most of the the women in them seem to be enjoying sex and having control of their bodies, which most would agree is a good thing. None of the “you'll get this job if you're a good lay” theme or body-shaming or marital strife common to many of these cartoons. The beefcake challenge I proposed earlier is still in effect. I don't feel gratuitous nudity is wrong, just that there's a disproportionate amount and I'm not only trying to promote my own preference.